tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-993379248704706187.post6533048844266439189..comments2024-01-22T19:38:47.034+08:00Comments on Basics of Saivism & Saiva Siddhantam: History of SaivismUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-993379248704706187.post-67856003198317252122021-09-23T13:46:42.526+08:002021-09-23T13:46:42.526+08:00Hi Sir, I was interested on your writings and came...Hi Sir, I was interested on your writings and came across the Aryan invasion that you wrote based on old indologists work. Are you aware that the term Aryan does not reflect language nor ethnicity? It started as linguistic study and the language was incorrectly associated with genetics (blue eyes and blonde hair). Linguist such as Nicholas Kazanas, Koenrad Elst and Srikanth Thalageri have shown that there this Aryan interpretation and the invasion (which switched to migration and now trickling of people) is not true. No linguistic evidence. Archeological evidence disproves the Aryan invasion. The horse artefacts are already found in India. The Sinauli chariot predates the invasion date which was crafted based on the biblical time of earth. The drying of River saraswathi is proven to be the reason for the fall of the civilisation. And the warming of earth some 11.6 thousand years ago stated as the reason for people to move from South to North, due to rise of sea level. The warmer climate allows agriculture in the area which was not possible before that. Dr. David Frawley who studied Rig Veda in Sanskrit said no trace of Aryan Invasion/migration. Neither the Sangam Text spoke of Aryan invading from North. It speaks about sunken land that corroborates Matsya Avatar and Kind Manu that moved from South to North due to deluge-rise of sea level in the south-possible due to warmer climate. All this put together, using latest findings-do you still believe Aryan Invasion? Isn't it more likely that there were one parent population that split into two and as they move south to north, due to "V" shaped geography of India and later one evolved to form unique population yet shares similar features? Please give me your thoughts in light of recent development on this Aryan debate. RegardsElanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15140012260013591530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-993379248704706187.post-23288751141381172152021-09-23T13:44:44.310+08:002021-09-23T13:44:44.310+08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Elanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15140012260013591530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-993379248704706187.post-51654946916978690102017-09-07T03:42:23.592+08:002017-09-07T03:42:23.592+08:00Concept of saivism...
Trione God
Heavenly life by...Concept of saivism...<br /><br />Trione God<br />Heavenly life by the sacrifice of God<br />God take a avatar as man..<br /><br />So it clearly says that st. Thomas disciple of jesus who comes to India during 1AD , is a reason for saivismquehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13785531526801494191noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-993379248704706187.post-38579413494271100012016-03-09T11:05:49.250+08:002016-03-09T11:05:49.250+08:00Savism was not rescued from the clutches of Jainis...Savism was not rescued from the clutches of Jainism. Savism crushed Jainism violently. Because Savism ( brahamans) afraid of competition. <br />Brahamins were afraid of loosing their position ( & wealth too) because jainism promote social equality & literacy.<br />They inventer " fake propaganda & fake stories " to justify their action and also to shape mind of illetrate people.<br />Brahmin alway promoted social inequality & illiteracy to safe guard their position. ( Divide & Rule)<br />It is very "Inhuman act" to celebrate massacre of jain monks " Samanar Kazuvetru" as religious festival from 1000 year. Very similar to islamic jihad & antisemitism of europe.<br />No religion in world celebrate massacre of their opponent as festival except Islam & Savism.<br />Essence of jainism is ahimsa ( non violence) by mind , speech & action . Even self defense is not allowed for jain monks.<br />Essence of jainism is keval gyan (absolute knowledge) & every soul has potential to achieve it by efforts ( sramana).<br />Essence of jainism is anekantvada ( every one will invent their own truth as per his understanding)<br />Essence of jainism is Syadavada ( logical reasoning & examination at every angle is necessary to realize the real truth.)<br />In jainism God is different from human they can't have human mentality & can't behaves as or like human.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-993379248704706187.post-19557846146338092992012-06-18T21:34:37.465+08:002012-06-18T21:34:37.465+08:00The Pashupati seal is actually of Rishabha, the gr...The Pashupati seal is actually of Rishabha, the great Jaina ascetic. In fact, Siva is a venerated form of Rishabha. After Rishabha renounced the material world and became a naked ascetic, he had a large number of followers. These followers were of two types.<br /><br />1) Those who imitated his way of life. ie the birth of Sramana Jains.<br /><br />2) Those who venerated Rishabha himself as a god ie Saivites<br /><br />For the Saivites, they required some form or figure to worship. <br /><br />From the earliest times the lingam and Yoni have been worshipped (in those days, if men or women could not conceive a child, they would try to appease the god of male or female reproductive organs by worshipping them in the form of a lingam or yoni)<br /><br />Since the lingam was already a figure of worship, and the fact that Rishabh was a NUDE ascetic, the lingam would be a perfect symbol for him.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16776775986963328831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-993379248704706187.post-45264810780039787152012-06-18T21:34:02.612+08:002012-06-18T21:34:02.612+08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16776775986963328831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-993379248704706187.post-54041231896857809052011-04-18T13:59:19.546+08:002011-04-18T13:59:19.546+08:00I appreciate your whole hearted efforts and thank ...I appreciate your whole hearted efforts and thank you for the blog. If you say that Pre-Aryan is Shaivite, how come there is not archeological or epigraphical evidence for Shiva worship in Sangam Period. Although the Irai Vanakkam songs are of shiva, no paripadal song is on shiva. Don't you feel there is a disconnect? Please reply. bjravishankar@gmaildotcomRAVISHANKARhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00223924192719941448noreply@blogger.com